Legal Opinion

Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The questions presented on this appeal are identical with the questions in Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank (271 N. Y. 294), decided herewith. The orders should be modified in accordance with the opinion in that case and, as so modified, affirmed, with separate bills of costs in all courts to the appellants. The first question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the defendant John F. Woods should be answered in the negative; the second question thereby certified should be answered in the affirmative. The second question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cotnareanu v. Chase National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haughey v. HaugheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API