Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Garden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In a proceeding to settle the account of executors, the Surrogate directed that insurance proceeds received in compensation for a missing diamond ring should be paid to the *159specific legatee of the decedent’s jewelry generally. Objectant, the decedent’s mother, appeals. Involved is the question of whether the legacy had been adeemed because the ring could not be found in a search commenced after the decedent’s death.

It is well established that a specific legacy will fail if the subject of it has ceased to exist so as not to be a part of the testator’s property at his death. (Matter of Ireland,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BrannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In Re the Accounting of National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Ametrano v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Horn's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. In re the Estate of HilpertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ZalaznickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of OestrichNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API