Legal Opinion

Kronenberger v. Hoffner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1869PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The controversy arises from a disagreement in regard to a boundary between the plaintiff and defendants, and the plaintiff brings his action for the possession of such portion of the property in dispute as will decide the location of the true line.

In 1853 the St. Louis University laid off a portion of a tract land owned by it into a subdivision called “ College Farm,” and the plat was duly recorded. The following diagram shows that part of the subdivision that embraces or affects the question of the disputed boundary:

The plaintiff owns lot No. 4, and the defendants lot No. 5, and the dispute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Gibson v. BogySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Evans v. GreeneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boxley v. EasterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Staub v. HamptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Whitehead v. RaganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Stanton v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Eversmeyer v. BroylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API