Gibson v. Bogy
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis Land Cou/rt. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court. I. The lot in question was not embraced in the deed from Gamble to Tabor and Collins. The call for the “ public road” is the governing call therein. I. The deed to Tabor and Collins embraced the land in dispute. (See 2 Greenl. Cruise, 334-5, note; 12 Ill. 38 ; 29 Maine, 178; 17 Mass. 211; 3 Greenl. 71; 11 Ill. 97; 29 Maine, 120; 1 Ired. 283 ; 3 Pike, 18.)
1Opinion of the CourtBichaRdson, Judge
This was an action of ejectment to recover the possession of that part of the United States survey No. 1483, which is situated east of a public road now known as Broadway, in the city of St. Louis. The whole survey is a tract of one by forty arpens, confirmed to Joseph Tayon by the act of Congress of the 29th of April, 1816, and surveyed in 1826. Both of the parties claim under Archibald Gamble, who was the owner of the whole tract in 1833. The deed to the plaintiff is dated in 1856, and describes the land conveyed as being the part of survey No. 1483 which lies east of Broadway. The deed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
3Cited by17 opinions
- Norman v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Buxton v. KroegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Orr v. RodeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- W. M. Ritter Lumber Co. v. Montvale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- West v. BretelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.