Legal Opinion

Hoeppner Construction Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1960No. 6124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought under the Miller Act (40 U.S.C.A. § 270 et seq., as amended) by the United States of America for the use of Trautman & Shreve, *836Inc.1 2against Hoeppner Construction Co., Inc.8 and Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company.3

In 1954, the United States Government entered into a contract with the prime contractor for the rehabilitation of 35 barracks located at Lowry Air Force Base, Denver, Colorado. The prime contractor and surety, as principal and surety, respectively, executed a payment bond in accordance with the requirements of 40 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. HollenbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  3. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. Drugs Service Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoeppner Construction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API