Legal Opinion

Villas West II of Willowridge Homeowners Ass'n v. McGlothin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2008No. 34S02-0805-CV-266PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

A homeowner whose deed contained various covenants applicable to her subdivision rented out her residence, notwithstanding a covenant not to do so. Her homeowners association sued to enforce the prohibition, and she countersued, claiming that the agreement she had made through the covenant violated the Fair Housing Act. Her counter-complaint appeared to include elements of two very different claims — disparate impact and intentional discrimination.

The trial court granted her relief, appearing largely to rely on disparate impact. We conclude that relief on these grounds…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Heartland Crossing Foundation, Inc. v. Chris M. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Noe Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Harness v. PARKARIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Highland Springs South Homeowners Ass'n v. ReinstatlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API