Legal Opinion

Pereira v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1889No. 12859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the defendant from interfering with the former’s use of certain natural waters of a stream claimed by the plaintiff as a prior appropriator, and for damages for injury already done in obstructing the flow of that water.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment as prayed for. From that, and an order denying a new trial, the defendant has appealed.

The main contention of the appellant appears to be that the court erred in making its fourth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth findings of fact, and a long and vigorous argument, of many…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Wheatland Mill Co. v. PirrieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ricks v. LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API