Legal Opinion
Rose v. Pine Bluff
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided September 26, 1932No. CR 3812PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.
This appeal is prosecuted by appellant from a judgment of conviction for violation of an ordinance of the city of Pine Bluff for peddling without having obtained a license therefor.
Paragraph 30 of § 1,300 of Lyle’s Digest of the ordinances of the city of Pine Bluff, reads as follows:
“It shall he unlawful for any person to engage in, exercise or pursue any of the following vocations without having first obtained and paid for a license therefor from the proper city authorities, the amounts of which license are fixed as follows, to-wit:
“No. 30. For peddling any other article not otherwise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. FettererSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- State v. . O'BriantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- El Dorado Baking Co. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937