Legal Opinion

Rose v. Pine Bluff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 1932No. CR 3812PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by appellant from a judgment of conviction for violation of an ordinance of the city of Pine Bluff for peddling without having obtained a license therefor.

Paragraph 30 of § 1,300 of Lyle’s Digest of the ordinances of the city of Pine Bluff, reads as follows:

“It shall he unlawful for any person to engage in, exercise or pursue any of the following vocations without having first obtained and paid for a license therefor from the proper city authorities, the amounts of which license are fixed as follows, to-wit:
“No. 30. For peddling any other article not otherwise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FettererSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  2. State v. . O'BriantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. El Dorado Baking Co. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API