Legal Opinion

State v. . O'Briant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Tbe defendant was indicted for “unlawfully and willfully engaging in tbe business of an itinerant merchant and peddler of goods, wares and merchandise without first having paid the license tax and obtained a license so to do, as required by law.”

The following is the special verdict and judgment:

The jury, after being impanelled to try the issue in the case, find the following special verdict: That the Durham Seed Company is engaged in the retail seed business and in the wholesale candy, cigar and tobacco business, located in the city of Durham, N. C.

That the defendant, H. C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. State v. FrankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. City of Greensboro v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. El Dorado Baking Co. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Rose v. Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API