Legal Opinion

Wolongevicz v. Stegmaier Brewing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

An opinion was filed in this case on April 19,1915, 60 Pa. Superior Court 352, in which we concluded that, “The money should have been paid to the admitted owner of the real estate. The interpleader issue should not have been awarded. The judgment is reversed, and the costs of the proceeding and of this appeal are to be paid by the Stegmaier Brewing Company, and the Susquehanna Brewing Company in the proportion of the verdicts recovered by them.” In so disposing of the case, it was our purpose to determine the rights of the parties in the feigned issue, to the fund in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Coughanour & Glessner v. BloodgoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  4. Hughes's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Stevenson v. SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reese, Frank Ordean v. Sparks, Gary E. Caskey, James E., Sease, Kenneth. Appeal of Frank ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Metro Real Estate v. Siaway, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Metro Real Estate v. Siaway, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API