Stevenson v. Sons
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 13, April T., 1899, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 20, on verdict for plaintiff. Opinion by Beaver, J. Trespass.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 13, April T., 1899, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 20, on verdict for plaintiff. Opinion by Beaver, J. Trespass. Before Frazer, J. It appears from the record of the former proceeding in this case in common pleas, No. 3, Allegheny couniy, February term, 1893, No. 14, that Frederick Maul had loaned Peck, Phillips & Wallace Company, $700, and had taken a judgment note for the same which was duly entered up by Whitesell & Sons, attorneys at law. The judgment was taken in the name of the Whitesells and by them subsequently assigned to…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
Whitesell, use of Maul v. Peck, 165 Pa. 571, and s. c. 176 Pa. 170, give us in result the basis of the present action. In the former Mr. Justice Williams, delivering the opinion of the court, says: “ This judgment was marked satisfied on the record on the 26th day of November, 1892, by Whitesell & & Sons, who were the legal plaintiffs therein, and the attorneys of their assignee, Maul. More than eighteen months afterward this entry of satisfaction was struck off by the court below, at the instance of Maul, who testified on the hearing that he made the application at the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. Peck, Phillips & Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wolongevicz v. Stegmaier Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915