Legal Opinion
City of St. Paul v. Spencer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 9, 1993No. CO-92-1381, C2-92-1382, C4-92-1383, C6-92-1384, CX-92-1632PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
The City of St. Paul challenges the trial court’s dismissal of its actions seeking permanent injunctions and orders of abatement under the public nuisance statute based on multiple convictions. The city argues the trial court erred in concluding Minn.Stat. § 617.81, subd. 3 (1990) requires a notice of conviction be sent to the building owner and other interested parties after each conviction. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant, the City of St. Paul, brought suit under the public nuisance statute, Minn.Stat. §§ 617.80-.87 (1990), to enjoin the continuation of alleged nuisances on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Hvamstad v. SuhlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Standslast v. ReidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rush v. JostockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- L.A.B. v. P.N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Lab v. PnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995