Legal Opinion

L.A.B. v. P.N.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1995No. C6-95-105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.

Appellant L.A.B. commenced a medical malpractice action against her former psychiatrist P.N. and her former psychiatric care clinic, respondent H.C. The clinic moved for summary judgment by reason of expiration of the two-year statute of limitations. See Minn.Stat. § 541.07(1). L.A.B. contended that her disability of insanity suspended running of the statutory limitation period. See Minn.Stat. § 541.15(a)(2). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the clinic, and L.A.B. appealed. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent H.C. (the clinic) is an outpatient clinic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Harrington v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Patton v. YarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Oak Park Development Co. v. Snyder Bros. of Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Prior, Belmay and Vermont State PoliceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Lab v. PnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API