L.A.B. v. P.N.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.
Appellant L.A.B. commenced a medical malpractice action against her former psychiatrist P.N. and her former psychiatric care clinic, respondent H.C. The clinic moved for summary judgment by reason of expiration of the two-year statute of limitations. See Minn.Stat. § 541.07(1). L.A.B. contended that her disability of insanity suspended running of the statutory limitation period. See Minn.Stat. § 541.15(a)(2). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the clinic, and L.A.B. appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent H.C. (the clinic) is an outpatient clinic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Harrington v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Patton v. YarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Oak Park Development Co. v. Snyder Bros. of Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eaton v. Prior, Belmay and Vermont State PoliceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Lab v. PnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995