Pattavina v. Pignotti
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The present appeal involves two cases that were consolidated for trial in the district court. The first case was a suit to foreclose certain notes and real estate mortgages executed in favor of Filippo Pattavina by Julio and Vincenza Pignotti, husband and wife. The answer pleaded usury as a defense. The second case was a suit by Julio Pignotti against Filippo Pattavina alleging that the notes and mortgages were usurious and praying for a reformation thereof to show the true amount of money loaned and the elimination of the interest provisions contained therein. The trial court found that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGovern v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Western Securities Co. v. NaughtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Upton v. O'DonahueNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Detweiler v. FormanNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seldin v. Northland Mortgage CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Gladfelter v. Fairleigh Dickinson UniversitySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1990
- Moffitt-Harrison Builders, Inc. v. SandmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Sones v. SpiegalNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Albers v. OVERLAND NATIONAL BANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.