Legal Opinion

Pattavina v. Pignotti

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1964No. 35652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The present appeal involves two cases that were consolidated for trial in the district court. The first case was a suit to foreclose certain notes and real estate mortgages executed in favor of Filippo Pattavina by Julio and Vincenza Pignotti, husband and wife. The answer pleaded usury as a defense. The second case was a suit by Julio Pignotti against Filippo Pattavina alleging that the notes and mortgages were usurious and praying for a reformation thereof to show the true amount of money loaned and the elimination of the interest provisions contained therein. The trial court found that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGovern v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Western Securities Co. v. NaughtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Upton v. O'DonahueNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Detweiler v. FormanNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seldin v. Northland Mortgage CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gladfelter v. Fairleigh Dickinson UniversitySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1990
  3. Moffitt-Harrison Builders, Inc. v. SandmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sones v. SpiegalNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Albers v. OVERLAND NATIONAL BANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API