Legal Opinion
Sayles Finishing Plants, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 17, 1968No. 5-64PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Roald A. Hogenson with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 57(a). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on January 25, 1968. On June 21, 1968 the parties filed a stipulation wherein, among other things, it is stipulated that the court may enter judgment in accordance with the Trial Commissioner’s opinion, findings of fact, and recommended conclusion of law which may be adopted by the court. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Benjamin D. And Madeline Prentice Gilbert v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- John v. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Kraft Foods Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Jean C. Tyler and Dolly Ann Tyler v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Hayutin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Texas Farm Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Bordo Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Electronic Modules Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.