Bordo Products Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Curiam :
This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion, filed March 12,1973, for judgment pursuant to Pule 141(b), requesting that the court adopt the recommended decision of Trial Commissioner Lloyd Fletcher filed November 29,1972, under Pule 134(h), as modified by order of February 22,1973, defendant having withdrawn its notice of intention to except thereto. The court has considered the case without oral argument of counsel and since it agrees with the trial commissioner’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it grants plaintiff’s motion and adopts the decision as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- John Kelley Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Benjamin D. And Madeline Prentice Gilbert v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Kraft Foods Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Brown Shoe Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Newark Morning Ledger Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Dougherty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Indmar Products Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- AWG Leasing Trust v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.