Legal Opinion

Saunders v. City of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The plaintiff, while walking at about six o’clock in the afternoon of October 13, 1934, along a brick sidewalk of a much travelled street located in the business district of the defendant city, caught her heel in a hole in the sidewalk and was thrown down. The hole was caused by the absence of one half of a brick. There was evidence that this hole was about one and one half inches deep; that the broken end of the brick had a "muddy look”; that "the material at the bottom of the hole consisted of rotten leaves and sweepings, rather firm in substance”; and that the general appearance of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Beauvais v. Springfield Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Fuller v. AndrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Keough v. E. M. Loew's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Connelly v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Bagdikian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Trites v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Christman v. SHAGOURY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Ajamian v. Town of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API