Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Southern Health Facilities, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1994No. 92-2534PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue certified to this court is essentially whether R.C. 2307.42 is invalid and of no force and effect by virtue of Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, for being in direct conflict with Civ.R. 11. For the following reasons we hold that R.C. 2307.42 is in conflict with Civ.R. 11 and is invalid and of no force and effect.

*237We recently resolved an issue analogous to the one considered in Hodge v. Cheek (1989), 64 Ohio App.3d 296, 581 N.E.2d 581, in the case of Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 221, 611 N.E.2d 789. In Rockey, we held that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hodge v. CheekOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API