Hiatt v. Southern Health Facilities, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The issue certified to this court is essentially whether R.C. 2307.42 is invalid and of no force and effect by virtue of Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, for being in direct conflict with Civ.R. 11. For the following reasons we hold that R.C. 2307.42 is in conflict with Civ.R. 11 and is invalid and of no force and effect.
*237We recently resolved an issue analogous to the one considered in Hodge v. Cheek (1989), 64 Ohio App.3d 296, 581 N.E.2d 581, in the case of Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 221, 611 N.E.2d 789. In Rockey, we held that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Hodge v. CheekOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by21 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.