Mesnager v. De Leonis
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County fixing the compensation of a receiver and of a referee in an action for partition. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
'LORIGAN, J.
This is an appeal from two orders made after the final decree in a suit for partition—the one allowing compensation to the receiver in the action for his services and those of his attorney, the other allowing compensation to the referee; also, an appeal from that part of the final decree directing payment of the amounts. The action in partition was commenced in 1898, and the receiver, Goldsworthy, was appointed in 1899, over the opposition -of appellants. He qualified as such with the knowledge of all the parties to the action, and continued to so act until the premises to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Woodward v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Treadwell v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Freeman v. McClungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963