HEJ Partnership v. Clinton County Commissioners
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
RODGERS, Senior Judge.
HEJ Partnership (HEJ) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Clinton County (trial Court) which affirmed a decision of the Clinton County Commissioners (County Commissioners) denying HEJ’s validity challenge to the Clinton County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance) and rejecting its proposed curative amendment. We affirm.
This action was argued seriatim to this Court in conjunction with Clout, Inc. v. Clinton County Zoning Hearing Board, — Pa.Commonwealth Ct. -, 657 A.2d 111 (1995), and the background facts are set out in greater detail therein. While the above…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- In Re Appeal of M.A. Kravitz Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Abbey v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Kratzer v. Board of Supervisors of Fermanagh TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ficco v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- In Re: Apr. 24 Dec. Apl of: Charlestown OutdoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022