Legal Opinion

In re T.D.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 2008PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 In these two consecutively listed appeals, Appellant, J.D. (Father), and Appellant, C.M. (Mother), collectively referred to as “Parents,” appeal from the order entered on July 25, 2007, that involuntarily terminated their respective parental rights to their minor son, T.D. As Parents raise parallel arguments, we address both appeals together, and after careful review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The record supports the trial court’s succinct summary of facts, which we reiterate as follows:

[Mother] and [Father] are the biological parents of [T.D.], born January 20, 1996, currently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re L.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In re B.L.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. In Re B.,N.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. In re C.M.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. In the Interest of A.L.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re T.S.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. In re N.A.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In the Interest of A.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. In re the Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights to E.M.I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Coulter v. Butler County Children & Youth ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API