Legal Opinion

Csatlos v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, William Osatlos, an infant, by John Csatlos, his guardian ad litem, from an order of the-Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 7th day of June, 1901, denying his motion for a resettlement of the case on appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

Plaintiff has recovered a verdict for $10,000 damages sustained through the negligence of the defendant in the operation of a street car. Upon the trial the driver of the car was called as a witness for the plaintiff. On cross-examination the witness, after testifying that *272he had made a statement concerning' the accident which the bookkeeper of defendant wrote dowm but which the witness did not sign, was shown a statement which he admitted had been subscribed by him in the presence of one Stansbury who presented the statement to him at the company’s office. The statement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Rubber Co. v. . RotheryNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Zimmer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Cooley v. Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Billy v. TatarskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API