Knestis v. Unemployment Compensation & Placement Division
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
— During the year 1937, the copartnership of Knestis and Zavales, doing business as the Lotus cafe in Kelso, had at least eight employees for twenty- weeks or more, hence were liable employers under Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 9998-108 [P. C. § 6233-311] (b), which provides for payment of.unem ployment compensation assessments by an employing unit who employs one or more individuals for twenty weeks or more within either the current or preceding calendar year. The copartnership paid the assessments levied against them for 1937. Their employment record disclosed that in 1938 the copartnership…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Carsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Luton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Kuhnle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Shannon v. SponburghWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Unemployment Compensation Department v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Peterson v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.