Legal Opinion
Quintanilla v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 2013No. 11-CF-1113PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Senior Judge:
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of several crimes attributable to a robbery at the intersection of Connecticut Avenue and K Street, N.W.1 He appeals only from his conviction for felony assault.2 During the robbery, the victim, Caroline Roth, suffered injuries to her head and hand. It is the extent of those injuries that provides the basis for appellant’s “sufficiency of the evidence” claim on appeal: that Roth did not suffer a “significant bodily injury,” a prerequisite to conviction under the felony assault statute. We agree with appellant that Roth’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Earle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re R.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nero v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Omar v. Rollerson & Rolita N. Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re D.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Reginald K. Teneyck v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- EDWARD BROWN v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.