Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Chittenden

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Johnson county. Heard below before Broady, J. cited: Bates v. Moore, 2 Bailey [S. Car.], 614; Gee v. Hieles, Rich. Eq. Cas. [S. Car.], 17; Carter v. Brown, 3 S. Car., 298; Brown v. Hoag, 29 N. W. Rep. [Minn.], 135, and notes; Lear v. Chouteau, 23 111., 39; Warren v. Dieleson, 27 Id., 115; Livesey v. LAvesey, 30 Ind., 398 ; Osborne v. Endieott, 6 Cal., 149; Woods v. Lille, 11 O., 455; Connor v. Hingtgen, 19 Neb, 472. cited: Waterman, Spec.

Read the full summary

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action for the specific performance of a contract for the exchange of real estate. It is alleged in the petition that “ on the 5th day of March, A. D. 1890, this defendant was the owner in fee simple of the following described property, to-wit: Lot No. 9 in block No. 2, in the city of Tecumseh, Johnson county, Nebraska, according to the recorded plat thereof, and on the 5th day of March, A. D. 1890, sold the same to this plaintiff; that the said sale was made upon the following agreement; that whereas this plaintiff was the owner of a ‘ timber claim’ in and from the United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Tyson v. WattsHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1847

3Cited by10 opinions

State v. ArnwineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
In Re T.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
Quinn v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
State v. PincusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
Local Bd. of Health of Berkeley Tp. v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.