Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schmidt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1928No. Appeal 360PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Appellant was convicted upon an indictment drawn under section 111 of the Act of March 31, 1860, P. L. 410, and charging him with having obtained, on April 1, 1925, from Helen Kendrick, the prosecuting witness, the sum of $2,300 by falsely pretending that a real estate and investment company, of which he was the president, was the owner of a certain mortgage upon premises situated at No. 2665 Sepviva Street in the City of Philadelphia, which security the company could and would sell and assign to her for that amount; whereas, the truth was that the company did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. ForneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. TudescoPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1960
  5. Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API