Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. City of Topeka

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 4, 1900No. 606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J. :

Prior to August 3, 1895, Frank Herald was the legally qualified and acting commissioner of elections for the city of Topeka. Upon said day the governor of the state legally issued an order removing him from said office, and R. B'. McMaster was duly appointed to fill the unexpired term. McMaster qualified and demanded possession of the office, which was refused, and an action of quo warranto was brought in the supreme court, said Herald ousted from office on December 7, 1895, and McMaster installed therein. During the period between August 3…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dolan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Commissioners of Saline Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. McCue v. County of WapelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Comstock v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Osborne v. . Canton and Kinsland v. . MacKeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Drach v. LeckenbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Jansky v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Osborne v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API