Legal Opinion

Comstock v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Case made from the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. Assumpsit. Defendant had judgment below.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

In April, 1878, Comstock was elected clerk of the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. The county clerk of Kent county, claiming to be ex officio clerk of the Superior Court, protested against Comstock’s being sworn in or recognized as clerk of the court, and the judge of that court refused to administer the oath to or approve of Comstock’s official bond. At the June term of this court a mandamus was granted requiring the judge of said Superior Court to administer to Comstock the constitutional oath of office and approve his official bond, which was done, and Comstock then entered upon the active…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kreitz v. BehrensmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McCue v. County of WapelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Ness v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Waterman v. Chicago & Iowa RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Rasmussen v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API