Legal Opinion

Madler v. McKenzie County

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1993No. Civ. 920028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Daniel Madler appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his action against McKenzie County. We affirm.

The North Dakota Department of Transportation [DOT] entered into an agreement with the Federal Highway Administration [FHWA] for federal funding of a bridge construction project in McKenzie County. DOT contracted with Edward H. Schwartz Construction [Schwartz] to construct the bridge. DOT then contracted with McKenzie County to provide “[a]dequate engineering, supervision, and inspection” for the project and to maintain the bridge after completion of construction.

Madler…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Erickson v. SchwanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Madler v. McKenzie CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tong v. BorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Oanes v. Westgo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Perala v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. FIRST AMERICAN BANK WEST v. MichalenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Jarvis v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API