Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Steinmetz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1930No. 149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.

This brings us to a consideration of the precise point of distinction between the Common Law jurisdiction over crimes and the Constitutional and Statutory jurisdiction of our State. The Constitution creates judicial power but does not prescribe any jurisdiction in criminal, matters. There can be no judicial power without jurisdiction. If the jurisdiction prescribed by Statute excludes all judicial power exercised by the Judiciary in criminal cases, then the question arises, how can any inherent power be exercised in disregard to statutory penalty and regulations concerning the assessment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Harris v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Morgan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. State v. HumanCrawford County Municipal Court · 1978
  4. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API