City of Moundridge v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Eighteen municipalities sued Exxon Mobil Corporation, BP America, Inc., Coral Energy Resources, L.P., Chevron Corporation,1 and ConocoPhillips Corporation for violating the antitrust laws by agreeing to artificially inflate the price of natural gas, monopolizing, attempting to monopolize, conspiring to monopolize, and engaging in price discrimination. A January 9, 2007 opinion (“January 9th opinion”) dismissed the complaint as to Chevron for lack of personal jurisdiction and as to Coral for failure to state a claim since its filed rates are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Moundridge v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Cockrum v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Modis, Inc. v. Infotran Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Design TechnologiesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Berg v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.