Legal Opinion

Liptak v. State Ex Rel. City of New Hope

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1983No. CX-83-1879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Facts

Frank Liptak, defendant-petitioner, moves, pursuant to Rule 120, Minn.R.Civ. App.P.:

1) for accelerated review of an appeal from Hennepin County Judge William B. Christensen’s order dated November 21, 1983, denying petitioner’s motion for continuance of a trial scheduled for November 28, 1983;

2) for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, a writ of prohibition staying the November 28, 1983 scheduled trial;

3) for discretionary review of an appeal of this order denying continuance;

4) a stay of all proceedings.

On or about February 8,1983, defendant-petitioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Bellows v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State v. HartmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. State ex rel. Stenstrom v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Christenson v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Heinsch v. Lot 27, Block 1 Fob's Beach, Section 21, Township 69, Range 21 (Unorganized Township), St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. MeldrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Bio-Line Inc. v. WilfleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Franklin Auto Body Co. v. WickerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API