Liptak v. State Ex Rel. City of New Hope
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Facts
Frank Liptak, defendant-petitioner, moves, pursuant to Rule 120, Minn.R.Civ. App.P.:
1) for accelerated review of an appeal from Hennepin County Judge William B. Christensen’s order dated November 21, 1983, denying petitioner’s motion for continuance of a trial scheduled for November 28, 1983;
2) for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, a writ of prohibition staying the November 28, 1983 scheduled trial;
3) for discretionary review of an appeal of this order denying continuance;
4) a stay of all proceedings.
On or about February 8,1983, defendant-petitioner…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Bellows v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State v. HartmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State ex rel. Stenstrom v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christenson v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Heinsch v. Lot 27, Block 1 Fob's Beach, Section 21, Township 69, Range 21 (Unorganized Township), St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MeldrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Bio-Line Inc. v. WilfleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Franklin Auto Body Co. v. WickerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.