Smith v. Calvary Christian Church
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
In this case, we are asked to decide whether plaintiffs intentional tort claims arising from church discipline are barred by the religion clauses of the federal constitution. Even if those constitutional provisions do not provide any defense to plaintiffs claims, however, plaintiff cannot prevail in this action. Through his words and deeds, plaintiff consented to the religious discipline imposed on him, so his claims fail as a matter of tort law. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and reinstate the trial court’s grant of summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. SchubertTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- VanVorous v. BurmeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.