Wooten v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JIM GUNTER, Justice.
1,Wooten asks this court to recall our mandate and allow him to pursue a second Rule 37 proceeding. He asserts that he meets this court’s stringent criteria for providing this extraordinary relief. Because this is a criminal appeal in which the death penalty has been imposed, and the petitioner is asking this court to recall our mandate, we have jurisdiction pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. l-2(a)(2) & 5-3(d). We grant the motion to recall the mandate.
Wooten was convicted of capital murder, criminal attempt to commit capital murder, and aggravated assault, and was sentenced to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Willett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Wooten v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Ward v. State.3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.