Legal Opinion

Wooten v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 2010No. CR 95-975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM GUNTER, Justice.

1,Wooten asks this court to recall our mandate and allow him to pursue a second Rule 37 proceeding. He asserts that he meets this court’s stringent criteria for providing this extraordinary relief. Because this is a criminal appeal in which the death penalty has been imposed, and the petitioner is asking this court to recall our mandate, we have jurisdiction pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. l-2(a)(2) & 5-3(d). We grant the motion to recall the mandate.

Wooten was convicted of capital murder, criminal attempt to commit capital murder, and aggravated assault, and was sentenced to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Willett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Wooten v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Ward v. State.3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API