Legal Opinion

Fairbank v. Fairbank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1914No. 18,612PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jackson district court; Oscar Raines, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

On March 31, 1906, Elizabeth Fairbank, a widow, executed to her son, Rudolph L. Fairbank, a warranty deed to a tract of land containing 350 acres. On February 14, 1907, she executed a will giving almost the whole of her property to him, and naming *46him as executor. She died on August 3, 1908. In an action brought by other heirs — her grandchildren — and participated in by her daughter, Eliza Carter, the deed and will were held to have been the result of undue influence, and were set aside. Rudolph L. Fairbank appeals.

Error is assigned with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Ginter v. GinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Mooney v. OlsenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. McCready v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Hoff v. HoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Ekern v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Olson v. HarshmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Osborne v. KingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API