Legal Opinion

Baiz v. Coro & La Vela Railroad

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 11, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeals from the adjudication of the receiver of an insolvent corporation in respect, to the. allowance of claims, and on application for a counsel fee for services rendered in the recovery of assets by the receiver and for the enforcement of an equitable assignment of or other equitable claim to a share of such assets.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, V. C.

There are in this proceeding three separate matters which have been to a large extent heard together. It will be the function of this memorandum to set forth, as briefly as possible, the conclusions which I have reached and state the principal reasons for 'such conclusions.

1. The first case to be considered is presented by the appeal of the Hnited States of Venezuela from the action of the receiver, in disallowing its claim to- a preferred charge amounting to $114,700, and interest to a large amount thereon, under a mortgage alleged to cover the entire fund in the receiver’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Zartman v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. American Bridge Co. v. HeidelbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Minneapolis & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Bata v. HillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  3. Bata v. HillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API