Legal Opinion

Bond Diamond Co. v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1959No. 22915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

Respondent Bond Diamond Company as plaintiff, sued appellants Harold and Opal Wilson, husband and wife, and Harry and Edwin Carstens on an open account. A jury was waived. Motion for directed verdict as to Edwin Carstens was sustained with no appeal therefrom. On April 15, 1958, plaintiff had judgment against the remaining three defendants in the sum of $3,973.37. On the same date and as part of the same judgment the court entered judgment for like amount in favor of defendant Harry Carstens against his codefend-ants Harold and Opal Wilson, “ * * * this judgment to be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barb v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Grue v. HensleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Algiere v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Gabel-Lockhart Co. v. GabelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Moberly v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCubbin v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Lange v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Burns & McDonnell Engineering Co. v. Torson Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Lock v. LaFeversMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API