Legal Opinion

In re C.L.C.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 2006No. 467A05PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

2Cited by38 opinions

In re T.N.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
In re Z.L.W.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
In re T.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
In re D.S.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
In re F.G.J. & M.G.J.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.