Legal Opinion
Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District
California Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1961No. Sac. 7229PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
55 Cal.2d 211 (1961)
LOUISA C. MUSKOPF et al., Appellants,
v.
CORNING HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Respondent.
Sac. No. 7229.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Jan. 27, 1961.
P. M. Barceloux, Burton J. Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein and Reginald M. Watt for Appellants.
Glenn D. Newton and William W. Coshow for Respondent.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, and Frederick G. Girard, Deputy Attorney General, Dion R. Holm, City Attorney (San Francisco), William F. Bourne and Beatrice Challiss, Deputy City Attorneys, Jennings, Engstrand & Henrikson and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Department of State Hospitals v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- City & County of San Francisco v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017