Austin v. Bundy
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, J.
The plaintiff brings his action under the common counts seeking to recover the sale price of a Hardwick combination gas and oil range, and a Duo-Therm pot burner set forth in specifications at $200. The defendant filed no answer and issue was joined under a general denial. A trial was had by a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which was granted. The case is here on the plaintiff’s exceptions to the action of the trial court in directing a verdict for the defendant, and to the judgment thereon.
In passing upon the defendant’s motion for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. StringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- Benoit v. MarvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Frenier v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Ready v. PetersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berry v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Eastman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Campbell v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Cheney v. WheelerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Shea v. Peter Glenn Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.