Legal Opinion
Baker v. Goetz
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 20, 1971No. Civ. A. 4072PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEEL, District Judge.
Three defendants, non-residents of Delaware, whose property purports to have been sequestered under FRCP 4(e) 1 in an action praying, inter alia, for a money judgment against them, have moved upon the basis of affidavits to vacate the sequestration and/or to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. FRCP 4(e) incorporates by reference 10 Del.C. § 366 2 and its implementing Court of Chancery Rule 4(db), Del.C.Ann. 3
The return of the sequestrator discloses that he purported to sequester the following property:
Property of Inter-Marketing Corp.
30,000 SSI Computer Corp. common…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Rebstock v. LutzSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Rebstock v. LutzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Schwartz v. MinerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Greyhound Corporation v. HeitnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- Baker v. GotzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Baker v. GotzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Arthur Cohn, and Michael Arthur Film Productions, a Company Doing Business Under the Laws of Liechtenstein v. Richard L. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.