Legal Opinion

Group v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 28, 1914No. 3783Published

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Action by T. H. Group against E. M. Jones. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Opinion by BREWER, C. It is admitted in the argument on the petition for rehearing that the former opinion, holding the case barred by the statute of limitations, would be correct, if this were a suit for the possession of land or to determine an adverse interest therein. But it is claimed that this is really an equitable bill to redeem, on the theory that the present defendant is merely a mortgagee in possession, because he deraigns his title through a claim commencing at a sale under a mortgage foreclosure which is asserted to be void. The prayer of the petition begins with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Bulat v. LondriganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API