Legal Opinion

In re the Election of Directors & of Certain Officers of the A. A. Griffing Iron Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 19, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On application to set aside election of directors and officers. Upon a summary hearing, under section 42 of “An act concerning corporations (Revision of 1896)” {Pamph.L.,p. 277), the affidavits and proofs of the parties present the following pertinent facts: The A. A. Griffing Iron Company was organized February 6th, 1881, under the General Corporation act of 1875. Gen. Slat., p. 904. In the by-laws adoptéd by the stockholders it was, among other things, provided that there…

Read the full summary

On application to set aside election of directors and officers. Upon a summary hearing, under section 42 of “An act concerning corporations (Revision of 1896)” {Pamph.L.,p. 277), the affidavits and proofs of the parties present the following pertinent facts: The A. A. Griffing Iron Company was organized February 6th, 1881, under the General Corporation act of 1875. Gen. Slat., p. 904. In the by-laws adoptéd by the stockholders it was, among other things, provided that there should be a board of five directors, to be elected by ballot at the annual meeting in May and to hold office for one…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Collins, J.

The organic law of the A. A. Griffing Iron Company subjected that corporation to the control of the legislature. Sections 14, 35. Therefore, we are now to look to the revision of 1896 of the Corporation act for its regulation. Section 1 of that statute enacts that every corporation shall have power to make by-laws fixing and altering the number of directors and providing for the management of its property and the regulation and government of its affairs. Section 2 enacts that the power to make and alter by-laws shall be in the stockholders.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Wickersham v. BrittanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gow v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  3. Toledo Traction, Light & Power Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913
  4. Moon v. Moon Motor Car Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  5. Burr v. Burr CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API