Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Rosario

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1994Published

1DissentWieand, Judge

The majority holds that even after a guilty plea has been accepted by a court following a determination that a factual basis exists therefor, the court may subsequently reject the guilty plea sua sponte because of information contained in a pre-sentence report. Because I believe this is contrary to the terms of 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 109 and 110, I must respectfully dissent from this part of the majority’s decision.

On the evening of December 6, 1990, the appellant, Agustín Rosario, and his sister, Nancy Rosario, met Maurice Scott, a gentleman of seventy years, at Stanley’s Cafe, a bar in Lancaster…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. StokesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. United States v. Carlos Rodriguez CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API