Legal Opinion
VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 26, 2021No. 3:19-cv-13955Unknown
1Opinion
*NOT FOR PUBLICATION* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG and AMERICAN REGENT, INC., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-13955 (FLW) v. OPINION MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD. and SANDOZ INC., Defendants. WOLFSON, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs Vifor (International) AG (“Vifor”) and American Regent, Inc. (“American Regent”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek judicial correction of claim 1 (the “Claim”) of United States Patent No. 10,519,252 (“the ’252 patent”) to correct an alleged error. However, because I find that any alleged error in the Claim is not clear and obvious…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Novo Industries, L.P., Plaintiff-Cross v. Micro Molds Corporation, and Oscar HelverCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Jerome H. Lemelson v. General Mills, Inc., General Mills Fun Group, Inc., Marvin Glass & Associates, and Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corp. v. CTS Cement Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.