Legal Opinion

State v. Voigt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1992No. C0-92-67PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

Respondent Jeffrey Voigt was charged with first-degree felony criminal damage to property in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.-595, subd. 1 (1990), and reckless driving in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.13, subd. 1 (1990). The omnibus court found that Voigt was subjected to custodial interrogation without being advised of his Miranda rights. It therefore suppressed Voigt’s confession and dismissed both counts of the complaint without prejudice.

FACTS

The facts are undisputed. At 5:18 a.m. on July 28, 1991, Deputy Sheriff Charles Larson responded to a call at a church…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HeremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. MoffattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. RosseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State, City of St. Paul v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API