Legal Opinion
In re Lynell H.
New York City Family Court
Decided December 2, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard D. Huttner, J.
The respondent is charged with acts that if committed by an adult would constitute robbery in the third degree (Penal Law, § 160.05) and he moves herein to suppress an identification on the ground that it resulted from an illegal arrest.
The victim testified that while a passenger on a subway train, the respondent in the company of another youth snatched a gold chain from his neck. The victim, after a short chase, apprehended the respondent’s companion and held him until the police arrived on the scene. The complainant gave a description of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Demetrius W.New York City Family Court · 1984
- In re HandNew York City Family Court · 1985
- In re HawkNew York City Family Court · 1985