Ronald Malam v. State of Missouri, Department of Corrections
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Dissent
*930DISSENTING OPINION
Mary R. Russell, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion neglects to apply the correct standard of review in reaching its decision to reverse the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (commission). The correct standard of review is whether there was sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the commission’s finding that Ronald • Malam failed to show his workplace accident was the “prevailing factor” that caused his medical condition. 'In light of the medical evidence offered here, the commission’s decision should be affirmed.
I. Standard of Review
O…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Treasurer of the State v. WitteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Tillotson v. St. Joseph Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Katy Dierks v. Kraft Foods a/k/a Adair Foods Company, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Mayfield v. Brown Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.