Mann v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, C. J.:
In this appeal, we are called upon to decide whether an *64accused’s statements made pursuant to a plea agreement with the prosecutor and in the course of entering a plea of guilty, subsequently withdrawn, are admissible to impeach the testimony of the accused at a later trial on the same charges. We conclude that they are not.
In June, 1977, William Patrick Mann was charged, by way of information, with one count of burglary, alleging his unlawful entry into a Red Wing shoe store with a larcenous intent. As a result of negotiations with the prosecutor, a plea…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HoopesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AmidonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Barrett v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Scott v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.