Legal Opinion

Neyland v. Brown

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1943No. Motion No. 16100; No. 2454—8013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

Our original opinion discloses that, with reference to “Items aggregating $34,-Í75.37 not bearing the OK of Neyland,” the jury made findings in favor of Brown & Root, but the trial court rendered judgment against them non obstante veredicto. The Court of Civil Appeals, 161 S.W.2d 833, reversed the trial court’s judgment on this phase of the case and rendered judgment on the jury’s verdict and we affirmed that portion of its judgment. In his second motion for rehearing Neyland invokes the rule which had become well established in this court prior to the effective date of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Le Master v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Johnson v. WoodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance v. LightfootTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Johnson v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greenspun v. GreenspunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Turner v. Houston Agricultural Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Page v. Layne-Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Briggs v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Luling Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API